Scoring model
Questi contenuti non sono ancora disponibili nella tua lingua.
Pegasus uses several scoring and ranking surfaces. They answer different questions and should not be collapsed into one number.
Coverage scores
Coverage scores structural deck health on a 0-4 scale.
0: missing1: weak2: adequate3: strong4: excellent
Dimensions:
- Access
- Conversion
- Protection
- Answer density
- Recovery
Each score should be read with its confidence, explanation, and evidence.
Simulation metrics
Simulation metrics are rates from sampled hands and turn horizons.
Examples:
- starter access rate
- playable hand rate
- dead hand rate
- starter plus extender rate
- engine online rate
- interaction access rate
Simulation is empirical. Coverage is structural. A good analysis view uses both.
Structural risks
Risks are warning flags such as brick risk, single point of failure, normal summon dependence, or low follow-up.
Risks are intentionally separate from coverage scores because they often describe specific failure modes.
Readiness status
Readiness is not a deck quality score. It is an inventory answer.
It compares:
- required copies
- owned copies
- available copies
- missing copies
- blocked decks
A ready deck can still be analytically weak. A strong deck can still be impossible to build from current inventory.
Acquisition priority
Acquisition priority ranks purchases by unlock value, scarcity, and estimated cost.
The current planning model uses:
- blocked target decks
- total missing copies
- currently available copies
- estimated total price
- price confidence
Cards that unlock several decks or remove scarce bottlenecks rank higher, especially when the estimated cost is low.
Interpreting scores responsibly
Use scores to decide what to inspect next.
Do not use them as:
- a guarantee that a deck is competitive
- a replacement for format knowledge
- a replacement for testing
- a universal comparison across unrelated deck styles
The best use of Pegasus scoring is directional: find the weak point, test a change, compare the version, and check whether readiness or acquisition got worse.